skip to main | skip to sidebar

Distortions at the New York Times

Lies, half-truths, flagrant disregard of national security, and other assorted nonsense at the New York Times

Sunday, May 11, 2008

The New York Times distorted the Duke Lacrosse Case.

An oldie, but very telling. At a time when it was obvious that the Duke 3 were innocent, the NYT tried to persuade its readers that they might be guilty. For details, see here.
Posted by William Jockusch at 10:58 AM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blogs

  • Michael Yon - Online Magazine
    Thank You
  • Back Talk
    Pandering to a Base that Loves Lies - How Trump Gets Away With it
  • Big Lizards
    Who Radicalized the British Right?
  • Durham-in-Wonderland
    Closing Comments
  • Power Line
  • Obama Campaign Gaffes
Show 5 Show All

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2008 (30)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ▼  May (16)
      • The New York Times Says it Supports a Strong Military
      • Figures Don't Lie, but Liars Do Figure
      • Pure Fantasy on the Editorial Page
      • The NYT's Contrasting Treatment of Conservative an...
      • A tale of two gaffes (again)
      • "Bogus" arguments about who loves America
      • The NYT Mischaracterizes the dispute between Obama...
      • The Big Lie Campagin continues
      • A tale of two gaffes
      • The NYT's reports on a French ring that sent fight...
      • A comprehensive, fact-based overview of media bias
      • The New York Times puts false words into John McCa...
      • The New York Times publishes, without challenge, a...
      • The New York Times publishes a misleading claim of...
      • The Big Lie Technique at the New York Times
      • The New York Times distorted the Duke Lacrosse Case.

About Me

William Jockusch
View my complete profile